This page has been archived.


In addition to the recommendations for the content of the bulletin, the committee wishes to direct the attention of the Secretary of the Department of Agriculture and the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to actions important to the use, implementation, and future development of the Dietary Guidelines.

The committee believes that the advice in the 1995 Guidelines, if followed, will lead to the improved health status of Americans and reduced health-sector costs. The committee recommends vigorous promotion of the Guidelines and their wide distribution made free of charge for use by health professionals, educators, and the media.

Prior to convening the 1990 committee, USDA conducted focus groups to determine consumer understanding of the messages in the 1985 Guidelines. The results of these studies were valuable in revising the Dietary Guidelines to convey a more meaningful message to consumers. To facilitate future revisions of the Guidelines, USDA and HHS are encouraged to continue to gather information similar to what is presently being collected through focus group testing.

There are significant barriers to consumer ability to implement the Guidelines, such as poverty, education, acculturation, and time. The committee recommends the development and publication of material giving practical advice on both family food management and congregant feeding. Particular attention should be given to the needs of the elderly.

Monitoring of food consumption and health indicators is essential to the development of the Dietary Guidelines. For example, survey data available to this committee show that the public is acting on the advice to reduce fat intake. Data also indicate, however, that consumption of key foods falls short of levels recommended in the 1990 edition and that the lower-fat diets tend to be less adequate in nutrients than those with more fat. This information was important in the committee's consideration of the Guidelines' revision. The committee strongly recommends continued support of national nutrition and health surveys, including the assessment of food consumption of individuals and families.

The 1990 and 1995 committees had the advantage of recently published documents such as the Surgeon General's Report on Nutrition and Health, the National Academy of Sciences report on Diet and Health and the Healthy People 2000 objectives to guide their deliberations (81,48,83). These documents provided insight about the major nutrition-related public health issues for the American public, as well as the current scientific base for dietary modifications appropriate to address these issues. Updating this knowledge is an essential part of the process to develop Dietary Guidelines.

While the committee recognizes that sound nutritional practices are important to good health at all life stages, the biology of growth and development make young children particularly vulnerable to poor nutrition and, conversely, also potentially the greatest beneficiaries of good nutrition. Similarly, the social and economic dependency of young children puts them at risk of poor nutritional practices. Exclusion of very young children from the guidelines is, therefore, inconsistent with both the important role of nutrition during that critical stage of growth and development and inconsistent with the programmatic roles played by local, state, and Federal governments in assuring the nutritional well-being of children.

The committee, therefore, strongly recommends the development of dietary guidelines for children, including those less than 2 years of age. To make this possible, a working group should be charged to develop provisional guidelines for children and supporting peer-reviewed documentation that is essential for this process. The lack of consensus documents focused on the needs of children has hampered the work of the present and past advisory committees.

Based on the experience of the 1995 committee, the agencies should consider some revisions to the process of developing the Guidelines. Several comments to the committee highlighted the difficulty of having a single bulletin address the needs of consumers, as well as policy makers and health professionals. A process that utilizes a two-step approach is encouraged. The first step would focus on determining the important nutrition-related public health issues and the dietary strategies that are most important. The second step would focus on effective communication messages to educate the public and achieve behavior modification. Such an approach would require that expertise in nutrition education as well as nutritional sciences be included in the committee or that a second committee with nutrition education expertise be appointed.

During its deliberation, some members of the current committee felt that there was a need to change the format of the Guidelines to be more effective in communicating current scientific thought. However, the implications of public misunderstanding of a change in format or key statements made it difficult to consider these modifications. To address this concern, issues regarding format and effective communication need to be a specific function of the next committee process.

The Dietary Guidelines form the basis of Federal policy related to nutrition and diet. Given this central role, it is essential that we build the knowledge base for these recommendations through continued research investment. For example, the deliberations of the committee emphasize the need for research to establish the relationship between fat consumption during childhood and long-term health outcome, the function and bioavailability of compounds in plant foods that are important for health, the implications for long-term health of body weight loss or maintenance or both, the association of food patterns and health outcomes, electrolyte balance and risk of hypertension, a better understanding of the physiological basis for the relationship between consumption of alcoholic beverages and cardiovascular disease, and the best ways to convey information about the role of diet and health to the public.


1.    Krebs-Smith SM, Smiciklas-Wright H, Guthrie HA, Krebs-Smith J. The effects of variety in food choices on dietary quality. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 87:897-903, 1987.

2.    Kant AK, Block G, Schatzkin A, et al. Food group intake patterns and associated nutrient profiles of the US population. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 91:1532-1537, 1991.

3.    White R, Frank E. Health effects and prevalence of vegetarianism. Western Journal of Medicine, 160:465-471, 1994.

4.    Whitehead RG. Lowered dietary energy consumption and potential consequences for micronutrient intake: An overview. In K Pietrzik, ed., Modern Lifestyles, Lower Energy Intake and Micronutrient Status, pp. 191-200. New York, Springer Verlag, 1991.

5.    Willett WC, Manson JE, Stampfer MF, et al. Weight, weight change, and coronary heart disease in women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273:461-465, 1995.

6.    Lee IM, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Change in body weight and longevity. Journal of the American Medical Association, 268:2045-2049, 1992.

7.    Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E, et al. Body size and fat distribution as predictors of coronary heart disease among young and older men. American Journal of Epidemiology. In press.

8.    Chan JM, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, et al. Obesity, fat distribution, and weight gain as risk factors for clinical diabetes in men. Diabetes Care, 17:961-969, 1994.

9.    Colditz GA, Willett WC, Rotnitzky A, Manson JE. Weight gain as risk factor for clinical diabetes mellitus in women. Annals of Internal Medicine, 122:548-549, 1995.

10.    Kuller LH, St. Jeor ST, Dwyer J, et al. Report of the American Institute of Nutrition (AIN) Steering Committee on Healthy Weight. Bethesda, MD, American Institute of Nutrition, 1993.

11.    Waaler HT. Height, weight and mortality. The Norwegian experience. Acta Medica Scandinavica, Supplementum, 679:1-56, 1984.

12.    Bouchard C, Perusse L, Leblanc C, et al. Inheritance of the amount and distribution of human body fat. International Journal of Obesity, 12:205-215, 1987.

13.    Shimokata H, Muller DC, Andres R. Studies in the distribution of body fat. III. Effects of cigarette smoking. Journal of the American Medical Association, 261:1169-1173, 1989.

14.    Wing RR, Matthews KA, Kuller LH, et al. Waist to hip ratio in middle-aged women: associations with behavioral and psychosocial factors and with changes in cardiovascular risk factors. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, 11:1250-1257, 1991.

15.    Troisi RJ, Heinold JW, Vokonas PS, Weiss ST. Cigarette smoking, dietary intake, and physical activity: effects on body fat distribution -- the normative aging study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53:1104-1111, 1991.

16.    Bjorntorp P. Abdominal obesity and the development of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metabolism Reviews, 4:615-622, 1988.

17.    Haffner SM, Stern MP, Hazuda HP, et al. Upper body and centralized adiposity in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites: relationship to body mass index and other behavioral and demographic variables. International Journal of Obesity, 10:493-502, 1986.

18.    Tremblay A. Despres JP, Leblanc C, et al. Effect of intensity of physical activity on body fatness and fat distribution. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51:153-157, 1990.

19.    Goldstein DJ. Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 16:397-415, 1992.

20.    Duncan JL, Gordon NF, Scott CB. Women walking for health and fitness; how much is enough? Journal of the American Medical Association, 266:3295-99, 1991.

21.    DeBusk RF, Stenestrand U, Sheehan M, Haskell WL. Training effects of long versus short bouts of exercise in healthy subjects. American Journal of Cardiology, 65:1010-1013, 1990.

22.    Ebisu T. Splitting the distance of endurance running: on cardiovascular disease and blood lipids. Japanese Journal of Physical Education, 30:37-43, 1995.

23.    Blair SN, Kohl HW III, Paffenbarger RS Jr, et al. Physical fitness and all-cause mortality. A prospective study of healthy men and women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262:2395-2401, 1989.

24.    Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273:402-407, 1995.

25.    Helmrich SP, Ragland DR, Leung RW, Paffenbarger RS Jr. Physical activity and reduced occurrence of non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. New England Journal of Medicine, 25:147-152, 1991.

26.    Neilsen Media Research. 1992-93 Report on Television. New York, A.C. Neilsen Co., 1993.

27.    Gortmaker SL, Dietz, WH, Cheung LWY. Inactivity, diet, and the fattening of America. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 90:1247-1255, 1990.

28.    Dietz WH, Gortmaker SL. Do we fatten our children at the television set? Obesity and television viewing in children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 75:807-812, 1985.

29.    Block G, Patterson B, Subar A. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutrition and Cancer, 18(1):1-29, 1992.

30.    Block G. Vitamin C and cancer prevention: the epidemiologic evidence. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53:270S-282S, 1991.

31.    Block G. The data support a role for antioxidants in reducing cancer risk. Nutrition Reviews, 50(7):207-213, 1992.

32.    Patterson, BH, Block G, Rosenberger WP, et al. Fruit and vegetables in the American diet: data from the NHANES II survey. American Journal of Public Health, 80:1443-1449, 1990.

33.    Patterson BH, Block G. Fruit and vegetable consumption: national survey data. In: CD Butterworth, ed., Micronutrients in Health and in Disease Prevention, pp. 409-436. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1991.

34.    Steinmetz KA, Potter JD. Vegetables, fruit, and cancer. Cancer Causes Control, 2:325-357, 1991.

35.    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Notice of final rule: food labeling: health claims and label statements; dietary fiber and cancer. Federal Register, January 6, 1993, pp. 2537- 2552.

36.    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration. Notice of final rule: food labeling: health claims and label statements; dietary fiber and cardiovascular disease. Federal Register, January 6, 1993, pp. 2552-2605.

37.    Czeizel AE. Folic acid in the prevention of neural tube defects. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, 20:4-16, 1995.

38.    Milunsky A, Jick H, Jick SS, et al. Multivitamin/folic acid supplementation in early pregnancy reduces the prevalence of neural tube defects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 262:2847-2852, 1989.

39.    Wald NJ. Folic acid and neural tube defects: the current evidence and implications for prevention. Ciba Foundation Symposia, 181:192-208, 1994.

40.    Wald NJ. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the medical research council vitamin study. Lancet, 338:131-137, 1991.

41.    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Service. Recommendations for the use of folic acid to reduce the number of cases of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 4, No. RR-14, 1992.

42.    Selhub J, Jacques PF, Bostom AG, et al. Association between plasma homocysteine concentrations and extracranial carotid-artery stenosis. New England Journal of Medicine, 332:286-291, 1995.

43.    Ueland PM, Refsum H, Brattstrom L. Plasma homocysteine and cardiovascular disease. In: RB Francis, Jr, ed., Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease, Hemostasis, and Endothelial Function, pp. 183-236. New York, Marcel Dekker, 1992.

44.    Stampfer M. Can lowering homocysteine levels reduce cardiovascular risk? New England Journal of Medicine, 332:328-329, 1995.

45.    Coull BM, Malinow MR, Beamer N, et al. Elevated plasma homocysteine concentration as a possible independent risk factor for stroke. Stroke, 21:572-576, 1990.

46.    Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (adult treatment panel II). Journal of the American Medical Association, 269:3015-3023, 1993.

47.    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Daily dietary fat and total food energy intakes - Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Phase 1, 1988-91. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 43(7):116-125, 1994.

48.    National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Food and Nutrition Board. Diet and Health: Implications for Reducing Chronic Disease Risk. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1989.

49.    Katan MB, Beynan AC, DeVries JHM, Nobels A. Existence of consistent hypo- and hyper-responders to dietary cholesterol in man. American Journal of Epidemiology, 123:221-234, 1986.

50.    Clifton PM, Kestin M, Abbey M, et al. Relationship between sensitivity to dietary fat and dietary cholesterol. Arteriosclerosis, 10:394-401, 1990.

51.    Hegsted DM, Ausman LM, Johnson JA, Dallal GE. Dietary fat and serum lipids: an evaluation of the experimental data. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57:875-883, 1993.

52.    Park YK, Yetley EA. Trend changes in use and current intakes of tropical oils in the United States. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51:738-748, 1990.

53.    Hayes KC, Khosla P. Dietary fatty acid thresholds and cholesterolemia. Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology Journal, 6:2600-2607, 1992.

54.    Fielding CJ, Havel RJ, Todd KM, et al. Effects of dietary cholesterol and fat saturation on plasma lipoproteins in an ethnically diverse population of healthy young men. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 95:611-618, 1995.

55.    Stamler J, Shekelle R. Dietary cholesterol and human coronary heart disease. The epidemiologic evidence. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 112:1032-1040, 1988.

56.    National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Cholesterol Education Program. Report of the expert panel on blood cholesterol levels in children and adolescents. NIH Publication 91-2732, 1991.

57.    The Writing Group for the DISC Collaborative Research Group. Efficacy and safety of lowering dietary intake of fat and cholesterol in children with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The dietary intervention study in children (DISC). Journal of the American Medical Association, 273:1429-1435, 1995.

58.    U.S. Department of Agriculture, Human Nutrition Information Service, Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Report of the dietary guidelines advisory committee on the dietary guidelines for Americans, 1990, pp. 2, 30.

59.    Glinsmann WH, Irausquin H, Park YK. Evaluation of the Health Aspects of Sugars Contained in Carbohydrate Sweeteners. Report of the Task Force, 1986. Washington, DC, Food and Drug Administration, 1986.

60.    Nutrition recommendations and principles for people with diabetes mellitus. Position statement. Diabetes Care, 17:519-522, 1994.

61.    Franz MJ, Horton ES, Bantle JP, et al. Nutrition principles for the management of diabetes and related complications. Diabetes Care, 17:490-518, 1994.

62.    Wolraich ML, Lindgren SD, Stumbo PJ, et al. Effects of diets high in sucrose or aspartame on the behavior and cognitive performance of children. New England Journal of Medicine, 330:301, 1994.

63.    Kinsbourne M. Sugar and the hyperactive child. New England Journal of Medicine, 330:355, 1994.

64.    Weiss G. Hyperactivity in childhood. New England Journal of Medicine, 323:1413, 1991.

65.    Zametkin AJ, Nordahl TE, Gross M, et al. Cerebral glucose metabolism in adults with hyperactivity of childhood onset. New England Journal of Medicine, 323:1361, 1991.

66.    Kruesi MJ, Rapoport JL, Cummings EM, et al. Effects of sugar and aspartame on aggression and activity in children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 44:11, 1987.

67.    White JW, Wolraich M. The effect of sugar on behavior and mental performance. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. In press.

68.    American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: use of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 93:816, 1993.

69.    Porikos JP, Hesser MF, Van Itallie TB. Caloric regulation in normal weight men maintained on a palatable diet of conventional foods. Physiology and Behavior, 29:293-300, 1982.

70.    Porikos KP, Booth G, Van Itallie TB. Effect of covert nutritive dilution on the spontaneous food intake of obese individuals: a pilot study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 30:1638-1644, 1977.

71.    Porikos KP, Pi-Sunyer FX. Regulation of food intake in human obesity: studies with caloric dilution and exercise. Clinics in Endocrinology and Metabolism, 13:547-561, 1984.

72.    Porikos KP, Van Itallie TB. Efficacy of low-calorie sweeteners in reducing food intake: studies with aspartame. In: LD Stegnik and LJ Filer, eds., Aspartame: Physiology and Biochemistry, pp. 273-286. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1984.

73.    Kanders BS, Lavin PT, Kowalchuk MB, et al. An evaluation of the effect of aspartame on weight loss. Appetite II, 11:73s-84s, 1988.

74.    Kanders BS, Blackburn GL, Lavin PT, et al. Aspartame facilitates long-term weight maintenance in a population of reduced obese women undergoing multidisciplinary treatment for obesity. Abstract. International Journal of Obesity, 15:61s-96s, 1991.

75.    Kanders BS, Lavin PT, Kowalchuk M, Blackburn GL. Do aspartame-sweetened foods and beverages aid in long-term control of body weight? Abstract. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51:515, 1990.

76.    Tordoff MG, Alleva AM. Effect of drinking soda sweetened with aspartame or high-fructose corn syrup on food intake and body weight. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 51:963-969, 1990.

77.    Rolls BJ. Effects of intense sweeteners on hunger, food intake, and body weight: a review. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53:872-878, 1991.

78.    Fomon SJ, Ekstrand J. Fluoride. In: SJ Fomon, ed., Nutrition of Normal Infants, pp. 299-310. Philadelphia: Mosby, 1993.

79.    Mattes R, Donnelly D. Relative contributions of dietary sodium sources. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 10:383-393, 1991.

80.    James WPT, Ralph A, Sanchez-Castillo CP. The dominance of salt in manufactured food in the sodium intake of affluent societies. Lancet, 1:426-429, 1987.

81.    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. The Surgeon General's report on nutrition and health. DHHS (PHS) Publication No. 88-50215, 1988.

82.    National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Food and Nutrition Board. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 10th ed. Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1989.

83.    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service. Healthy people 2000: national health promotion and disease prevention objectives. PHS Publication No. 91-50212, 1991.

84.    Cutler JA, Kotchen TA, Obarzanek E. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop on salt and blood pressure. Hypertension, 17:I-1I-221, 1991.

85.    Law MR, Frost CD, Wald NJ. By how much does dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure. I. Analysis of observational data among populations. British Medical Journal, 302:811-814, 1991.

86.    Frost CD, Law MR, Wald NJ. By how much does dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure. II. Analysis of observational data within populations. British Medical Journal, 302:815-818, 1991.

87.    Law, MR, Frost CD, Wald NJ. By how much does dietary salt reduction lower blood pressure. III. Analysis of data from trials of salt reduction. British Medical Journal, 302:819-824, 1991.

88.    National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group. National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group report on primary prevention of hypertension. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153:186-208, 1993.

89.    Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group. The effects of nonpharmacologic interventions on blood pressure of persons with high normal levels. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267:1213-1220, 1992.

90.    Cook NR, Cohen J, Hebert PR, et al. Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Archives of Internal Medicine, 155:709-710, 1995.

91.    National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The fifth report of the joint national committee on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. Archives of Internal Medicine, 153:154-183, 1993.

92.    Dyer AR, Shipley M, Elliot P for the INTERSALT Cooperative Research Group. Urinary electrolyte excretion in 24 hours and blood pressure in the INTERSALT study II. Estimates of electrolyte-blood pressure associations corrected for regression dilution bias. American Journal of Epidemiology, 139:940-951, 1994.

93.    Whelton PK, Buring J, Borhani NO, et al., for the Trials of Hypertension Prevention Collaborative Research Group. The effect of potassium supplementation in persons with a high-normal blood pressure: results from phase I of the trials of hypertension prevention (TOHP). Annals of Epidemiology, 5:85-95, 1995.

94.    Morris RC Jr., Sebastian A. Potassium-responsive hypertension. In: JH Laragh and BM Brenner, eds., Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management, 2nd ed., pp. 2715-2726. New York: Raven Press, 1995.

95.    Hamet P. The Evaluation of the Scientific Evidence for a Relationship Between Calcium and Hypertension. Bethesda, MD: Life Sciences Research Office, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 1993.

96.    Nordin BEC, Need AG, Morris HA, Horowitz M. The nature and significance of the relationship between urinary sodium and urinary calcium in women. Journal of Nutrition, 123:1615-1622, 1993.

97.    Alaimo K, McDowell MA, Briefel RR, et al. Dietary intake of vitamins, minerals, and fiber of persons ages 2 months and over in the United States. Advance data. National Center for Health Statistics Publication No. 258, 1994.

98.    Public Law 535, 101st Cong., 2nd sess., (November 8, 1990).

99.    Fuchs CS, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, et al. Alcohol consumption and mortality among women. New England Journal of Medicine, 232:1245-1250, 1995.

100.    Klatsky AL. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease -- influence of alcohol. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, 18:88-96, 1994.

101.    Klatsky AL, Armstrong MA, Freedman GD. Risk of cardiovascular mortality in alcohol drinkers, exdrinkers and nondrinkers. American Journal of Cardiology, 66:1237-1242, 1990.

102.    Gaziano JM, Buring JE, Breslow JL, et al. Moderate alcohol intake, increased levels of high-density lipoprotein and its subfraction, and decreased risk of myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine, 329:1829-1834, 1993.

103.    Witteman MCM, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, et al. Relation of moderate alcohol consumption and risk of systemic hypertension in women. American Journal of Cardiology, 65:633-637, 1990.

104.    National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Moderate drinking. Alcohol alert. DHHS-NIH-NIAAA No. 16, PH 315, 1992.

The next section of the Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee  is the Appendix I: History of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans.